Global Score | |
60.6 | 64.8 |
Basic Information | |
HTC | Nokia |
Android 4.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
2014-02-24 | 2019-06-10 |
5.63 x 2.78 x 0.38 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
5.06 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
Black, Blue, Green, Red and White | Black |
-- | Metal and Plastic |
-- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
$ 109.00 | $ 90.00 |
Display / Screen | |
4.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
480 x 854 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
-- | IPS LCD |
208 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
7 | 7.3 |
Performance | |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
8.37 | 8.73 |
Storage | |
8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
5.62 | 8.12 |
Camera | |
8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
7.26 | 8.47 |
Networks | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
-- | Mobile Hotspot |
LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
6.5 | 6.1 |
Battery Life | |
2040mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
15.8 hours talk time | -- |
3.92 | 4.96 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
GPS | GPS |
Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
-- | FM Radio |
The Nokia 3.1 A is just a bit better than HTC Desire, with a overall score of 64.8 against 60.6. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but the Nokia 3.1 A has the newer 9.0 Pie version and HTC Desire has Android 4.4. Nokia 3.1 A's body is much newer and just a little thinner, but just a little heavier than HTC Desire.
Nokia 3.1 A counts with a little bit better hardware performance than HTC Desire, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, and they both have 4 CPU cores, the Nokia 3.1 A also counts with a higher amount of RAM. The Nokia 3.1 A features a bit more vivid display than HTC Desire, because it has a bigger display, a much higher 720 x 1440 resolution and a higher pixels density.
The Nokia 3.1 A features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than HTC Desire, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits up to 128 GB, the Nokia 3.1 A also has 32 GB internal memory. Nokia 3.1 A shoots better photographs and videos than HTC Desire, and although they both have a back-facing camera with an 8 MP resolution, the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Nokia 3.1 A also has a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
The Nokia 3.1 A counts with a really longer battery lifetime than HTC Desire, because it has a 2990mAh battery capacity.
Nokia 3.1 A is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an obvious call.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.