Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.7 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-10 |
| 5.78 x 2.79 x 0.32 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 95.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 800 hours standby time 20.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3.1 A is just a bit better than HTC Desire 626, getting a 64.8 score against 62.7. Despite being the best in this comparison, Nokia 3.1 A's construction is somewhat thicker and heavier than the HTC Desire 626. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia 3.1 A has newer 9.0 Pie version while HTC Desire 626 has Android 4.4.4 version, providing the user some additional features and better performance.
HTC Desire 626 has a bit sharper screen than Nokia 3.1 A, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1280 x 720, it also counts with a bit higher amount of pixels per display inch. The Nokia 3.1 A features much more memory to install applications and games than HTC Desire 626, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 128 GB, the Nokia 3.1 A also has more internal memory capacity.
The HTC Desire 626 counts with just a bit better performance than Nokia 3.1 A, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 4 cpu cores, the HTC Desire 626 also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and an extra GPU. The Nokia 3.1 A has a way better battery performance than HTC Desire 626, because it has a 50% more battery capacity.
The Nokia 3.1 A features a little bit better camera than HTC Desire 626, because although it has a lower (Full HD) video definition and a much lower 8 megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
Nokia 3.1 A not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.