Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 2.2, 2.1 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.69 x 2.36 x 0.47 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 252 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7627A chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 384 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (enhanced) (200 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 136 hours standby time 6.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is way better than the HTC Desire CDMA, having an 83.8 score against 49.2. Galaxy A50's body is notably thinner but somewhat heavier than HTC Desire CDMA. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much greater performance than HTC Desire CDMA, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A50 has a bit more vivid display than HTC Desire CDMA, because it has a much better screen density, a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a really larger screen. Galaxy A50 counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC Desire CDMA, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior battery performance than HTC Desire CDMA, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A50 captures much better photographs and videos than HTC Desire CDMA, because it has a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy A50 is a bit more expensive than HTC Desire CDMA, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.