Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.6 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-08 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| -- | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 335.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2300 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 8.03 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2400mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is way better than the HTC Desire EYE, getting a general score of 87.6 against 65.6. These devices come with Android operating system, but the LG V60 ThinQ has an older 11 version while HTC Desire EYE has Android 4.4.4. LG V60 ThinQ's construction is a lot newer, but a lot heavier and just a little thicker than HTC Desire EYE.
The HTC Desire EYE counts with just a bit better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher screen pixels density. The LG V60 ThinQ has a much greater memory to install applications and games than HTC Desire EYE, because it has 112 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a bit faster processing unit than HTC Desire EYE, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM. The LG V60 ThinQ features a much better battery duration than HTC Desire EYE, because it has a 108 percent greater battery capacity. The LG V60 ThinQ captures way better photos and videos than HTC Desire EYE, because it has a larger camera aperture for better captures in poorly lited environments, a way more MP back camera and a much better video definition.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, LG V60 ThinQ is also cheap compared to the HTC Desire EYE.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.