Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.6 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| 2014-10-08 | 2014-09-03 |
| 5.97 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 335.00 | $ 335.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 525 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2300 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.03 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.8 | 7.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2400mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 20 hours talk time | 18 hours talk time |
| 4.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Edge has a general score of 81.7, which is way better than HTC Desire EYE's 65.6 score. The Samsung Galaxy Note Edge construction has the same thickness than the HTC Desire EYE, but it's heavier. These devices have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note Edge has 5.0 version and HTC Desire EYE has Android 4.4.4, providing the user some additional features.
Galaxy Note Edge counts with a bit better processing power than HTC Desire EYE, and although they both have a Quad-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note Edge also has a greater amount of RAM memory and an additional graphics processor. Galaxy Note Edge features a sharper display than HTC Desire EYE, because it has a quite higher count of pixels per display inch, a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a quite larger display.
Galaxy Note Edge counts with much more memory for apps and games than HTC Desire EYE, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 128 GB, the Galaxy Note Edge also has 16 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy Note Edge takes much better photos and videos than HTC Desire EYE, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera with more mega pixels.
Galaxy Note Edge has greater battery performance than HTC Desire EYE, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note Edge and the HTC Desire EYE cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.