Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 4.0 | -- |
| 2012-08-30 | 2017-10-19 |
| 4.67 x 2.45 x 0.37 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.02 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD 2 | AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 768 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 203 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 720 x 480 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.6 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 750 hours standby time 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a lot better than HTC Desire X, with a overall score of 81.6 against 55.8. Google Pixel 2's body is extremely newer and somewhat thinner than HTC Desire X's, although it is heavier. Google Pixel 2 features a superior CPU than HTC Desire X, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and 3,25 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little more vivid display than HTC Desire X, because it has a much better pixels density, a bigger display and a way better 1080 x 1920 resolution. The Google Pixel 2 takes a lot better videos and photos than HTC Desire X, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better photography in low light environments, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with a much higher 12.2 megapixels resolution.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC Desire X, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 2 has a much better battery lifetime than HTC Desire X, because it has a 64% more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Google Pixel 2 is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.