Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
64 GBSM-N9005
| Global Score | |
| 54.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.0, 2.3 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2011-03-22 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.00 x 2.60 x 0.47 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM8660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Scorpion (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 1 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.72 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 3.2 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1730mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 hours talk time | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 3.6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 81.1, which is way better than HTC EVO 3D's 54.3 score. Samsung Galaxy Note 3's construction is notably newer, much thinner and a bit lighter than HTC EVO 3D. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version and HTC EVO 3D has Android 4.0 version, providing a couple additional features.
Galaxy Note 3 has a much more vibrant display than HTC EVO 3D, because it has a way bigger screen, a way better 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a lot higher pixels number per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC EVO 3D, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 64 GB and 63 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy Note 3 features a quite better processing power than HTC EVO 3D, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster), more RAM and a better GPU running at 450 megahertz. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a lot better camera than HTC EVO 3D, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a way better battery lifetime than HTC EVO 3D, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 is a little more expensive than the HTC EVO 3D, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.