Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Windows Mobile Professional 6.5 | -- |
| 2010-02-16 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.09 x 2.27 x 0.46 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 180 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Single-Core 600 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 384 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.84 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 340 hours standby time 7.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is way better than HTC HD mini's general score of 46.7. Samsung Galaxy A50's body is newer and a lot thinner, but also heavier than the HTC HD mini. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with an incredibly better screen than HTC HD mini, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, much more pixels per inch in the screen and a much larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a way bigger storage to install games and applications than HTC HD mini, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A50 has a lot better processing power than HTC HD mini, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A50 captures a lot better photographs and videos than HTC HD mini, because it has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a lot higher (Full HD) video definition. The Galaxy A50 features a much longer battery duration than HTC HD mini, because it has a 233% bigger battery size.
The Galaxy A50 costs a bit more money than HTC HD mini, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.