Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.64 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is better than the HTC One A9, with an 81.2 score against 72.1. Motorola Edge 50's body is notably newer, but a bit thicker and much heavier than HTC One A9. The HTC One A9 features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a brighter display than HTC One A9, because it has a higher resolution of 1220 x 2712, a just a little greater pixels count in each inch in the display and a much bigger display. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a lot better camera than HTC One A9, because it has a lot more MP camera in the back, a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in low light situations.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a slightly better storage capacity for apps and games than HTC One A9, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 features a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One A9, because it has a 133% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.