Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic indigo |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus is much better than HTC One A9, getting a overall score of 79.7 against 72.1. Motorola Moto G Stylus's design is noticeably newer, but a lot heavier and thicker than the HTC One A9. The Moto G Stylus features a bit faster processor than HTC One A9, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Moto G Stylus also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
The HTC One A9 has a bit more vivid display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel number per display inch. Motorola Moto G Stylus features a better memory for games and applications than HTC One A9, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Moto G Stylus captures much clearer photographs and videos than HTC One A9, because it has a way higher resolution camera in the back, a bigger camera aperture and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Moto G Stylus counts with a way better battery lifetime than HTC One A9, because it has an 86% larger battery capacity.
The Moto G Stylus is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.