Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2015-11-06 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 441 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is much better than HTC One A9, with an 84.7 score against 72.1. Galaxy A32's construction is incredibly newer, but notably heavier and thicker than HTC One A9. HTC One A9 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a much greater pixels number per display inch.
Galaxy A32 counts with a bit better performance than HTC One A9, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A32 also has 1 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A32 takes greater photos and videos than HTC One A9, because it has a bigger aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited situations, a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One A9, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A32 features a way better battery life than HTC One A9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2150mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.