Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2015-11-06 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than HTC One A9, having an 83.8 score against 72.1. Samsung Galaxy A50's design is notably newer, but somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker than HTC One A9. Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than HTC One A9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
HTC One A9 and Samsung Galaxy A50 feature really similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little bit inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Galaxy A50 counts with a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One A9, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much longer battery life than HTC One A9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2150mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A50 shoots better videos and photos than HTC One A9, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a larger aperture for better low light images and video.
The Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.