Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is way better than the HTC One A9, having a overall score of 91.8 against 72.1. The Galaxy A71 5G construction is incredibly newer, but just a little bit thicker and heavier than the HTC One A9. Galaxy A71 5G features a screen that is very similar to the HTC One A9 one, because although the Galaxy A71 5G has a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a way bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a much bigger storage to install applications and games than HTC One A9, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit faster processor than HTC One A9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a superior battery lifetime than HTC One A9, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Galaxy A71 5G shoots a lot better photos and videos than HTC One A9, because it has a much higher video quality, a larger camera aperture and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy A71 5G is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.