| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2015-04-11 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Metal | Aluminium and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 252.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2550mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
The Samsung Galaxy S6 is a lot better than the HTC One A9, getting a general score of 87.4 against 72.1. Even when the Samsung Galaxy S6 and the HTC One A9 were released with only 7 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy S6 is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. The Galaxy S6 has a faster processor than HTC One A9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount, the Galaxy S6 also has a 64-bit CPU and a graphics processor.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 features a way better looking display than HTC One A9, because it has a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen, a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little bit bigger display. The HTC One A9 features a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S6, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S6 counts with better battery performance than HTC One A9, because it has a 2550mAh battery capacity. Galaxy S6 features a superior camera than HTC One A9, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video definition, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography in low light environments and a back camera with more mega pixels.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S6 is also a bargain compared to others, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.