| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 85.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2015-04-10 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 5.59 x 2.76 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 4.66 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Metal | Aluminium and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge is better than the HTC One A9, having an 85.7 score against 72.1. Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge is a just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter device than the HTC One A9, even though they were released with only 7 months difference. Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge has an incredibly better looking screen than HTC One A9, because it has a quite bigger display, a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater pixel density.
Galaxy S6 Edge counts with a faster CPU than HTC One A9, and although they both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Edge also has a 64-bit CPU and an additional graphics processor. HTC One A9 has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 Edge, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S6 Edge has improved battery duration than HTC One A9, because it has a 21 percent greater battery size. The HTC One A9 captures a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing images in low-light environments, a back facing camera with less mega pixels and a lot lower 1920x1080 video resolution.
Galaxy S6 Edge costs a lot more than the HTC One A9, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.