Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 441 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is better than the HTC One A9, getting a global score of 80.1 against 72.1. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is notably newer, but a lot thicker and way heavier than HTC One A9. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little more vivid display than HTC One A9, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560, a higher screen pixels density and a little bigger screen.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit superior processor than HTC One A9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has 1 GB more RAM. The HTC One A9 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the HTC One A9 also counts with a back facing camera with a better resolution.
HTC One A9 features a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior battery life than HTC One A9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC One A9, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC One A9. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, otherwise you can save some money and get the HTC One A9, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.