Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.64 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the HTC One A9, having a score of 77.8 against 72.1. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro body is way newer and noticeably thinner, but also extremely heavier than the HTC One A9. The HTC One A9 counts with a very superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better looking display than HTC One A9, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a really bigger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger memory for applications and games than HTC One A9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior camera than HTC One A9, because it has a way better resolution camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and a way better 7680x4320 video definition. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than HTC One A9, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC One A9, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC One A9. So if you need that extra features, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save some money and buy the HTC One A9, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.