Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 6.0 | -- |
| -- | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.01 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 is slightly better than the HTC One A9, getting a overall score of 77 against 71.3. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the LG V20 construction is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than HTC One A9. The LG V20 counts with a superior processing power than HTC One A9, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The HTC One A9 features a bit more vivid screen than LG V20, although it has a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse display density. The LG V20 features a better memory for games and applications than HTC One A9, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V20 also has more internal memory capacity.
LG V20 features a much better camera than HTC One A9, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and videos, a lot better video resolution and a higher 16 mega pixels resolution camera in the back. LG V20 has a much better battery duration than HTC One A9, because it has a 49% larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG V20 is also by far the cheapest, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.