Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-03 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.39 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue, Gray, Red and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 26.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is a lot better than HTC One (E8)'s overall score of 70. Even though LG Velvet is somewhat heavier than HTC One (E8), it's way thinner and also newer. The LG Velvet has a little bit better performance than HTC One (E8), because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with more cores and 4 GB more RAM memory.
HTC One (E8) features a little bit better display than LG Velvet, because although it has a much smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better number of pixels in each screen inch. LG Velvet has a lot better camera than HTC One (E8), because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video definition, a back camera with way more MP and a larger aperture to capture better low-light images.
The LG Velvet counts with a superior memory for applications and games than HTC One (E8), because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage. The LG Velvet features a really longer battery performance than HTC One (E8), because it has a 65 percent more battery size.
LG Velvet not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.