Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.5 | 73.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2, 4.1.2 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2013-02-19 | 2018-07-13 |
| 5.41 x 2.69 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 107.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| S-LCD 3 | TFT |
| 469 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 768 x 432 (96 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.14 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 408 hours standby time 16.7 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has a score of 73.1, which is a little bit better than HTC One's 70.5 general score. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star is a newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than HTC One, although it's also much heavier. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and HTC One has Android 5.0 version, so it provides some nice extra features.
HTC One features an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot better display pixel density. HTC One features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have 2 GB of RAM, the HTC One also counts with a graphics processor.
Galaxy J7 Star has a much better camera than HTC One, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy J7 Star also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and a much more MP back camera.
Galaxy J7 Star counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star features a much longer battery performance than HTC One, because it has a 43% bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.