Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | Android 13 |
| 2014-03-25 | 2023-09-14 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminium | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 325.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Neo is a bit better than HTC One (M8), getting a global score of 77 against 71.9. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo is a newer and somewhat thinner device than HTC One (M8), although it's also just a little heavier. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 40 Neo has newer 13 version while HTC One (M8) has Android 5.0.
The HTC One (M8) has a slightly better looking display than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a much smaller display and a little lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a much greater storage to store more games and applications than HTC One (M8), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The HTC One (M8) counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shoots much better photos and videos than HTC One (M8), because it has a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a camera with a lot higher resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a really longer battery lifetime than HTC One (M8), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.