Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-03-25 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | -- |
| Aluminium | Plastic |
| $ 325.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is way better than the HTC One (M8), getting a 90.7 score against 71.9. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a way newer and somewhat thinner phone than HTC One (M8), but it is heavier. HTC One (M8) features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than HTC One (M8), because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB. The HTC One (M8) has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
The Galaxy A52 features a really longer battery lifetime than HTC One (M8), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots much better pictures and videos than HTC One (M8), because it has a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution, a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low-light environments and a way larger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.