Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-03-25 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Black and Gold |
| Aluminium | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is better than the HTC One (M8), getting an 81 score against 71.9. Although Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is heavier than the HTC One (M8), it's noticeably thinner and also noticeably newer. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version and HTC One (M8) has Android 5.0, providing the user a couple additional features and better performance.
The HTC One (M8) counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The HTC One (M8) has a brighter screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1920 x 1080px, the HTC One (M8) also counts with a quite higher screen pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC One (M8), because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a superior battery performance than HTC One (M8), because it has a 54 percent more battery size.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much better camera than HTC One (M8), because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy C9 Pro also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.