Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Vivo |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-03-25 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Black and White |
| Aluminium | -- |
| $ 325.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than HTC One (M8), having a 77.8 score against 71.9. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's design is notably newer and notably thinner than the HTC One (M8)'s, but it's also notably heavier. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version while HTC One (M8) has Android 5.0 version, so it offers a lot of extra features and a performance increase.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a brighter display than HTC One (M8), because although it has a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a really bigger screen and a way better 2200 x 2480px resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One (M8), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The HTC One (M8) counts with a lot better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM and lesser cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a graphics processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than HTC One (M8), because it has a larger aperture for better photography in low light environments, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor, a much more MP camera in the back and a much better video resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior battery performance than HTC One (M8), because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than HTC One (M8), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC One (M8). So if you want that extra features, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and get the HTC One (M8), giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.