Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 20.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is way better than the HTC One M8s, getting an 81.3 score against 66.5. LG V35 ThinQ's design is just a bit lighter and incredibly thinner than HTC One M8s. The LG V35 ThinQ features a better processor than HTC One M8s, because it has a greater number of cores and 4 GB more RAM. The HTC One M8s has a slightly better display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little smaller screen.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M8s, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. LG V35 ThinQ has a lot better camera than HTC One M8s, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments, a lot higher video quality and a higher resolution back-facing camera.
The LG V35 ThinQ features longer battery duration than HTC One M8s, because it has a 16% more battery size.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than HTC One M8s, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.