Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-03-01 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.99 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 is a bit better than HTC One M9, having a overall score of 85 against 77.7. The Apple iPhone 8 is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it's also much thinner and a little lighter than the HTC One M9. The HTC One M9 has a much better looking screen than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a little larger display, a greater pixel density and a much better resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.
The iPhone 8 counts with a bit better processing unit than HTC One M9, although it has an inferior number of cores , lesser RAM and doesn't have a graphics processor, they both have a 64-bit processing unit. The HTC One M9 and the iPhone 8 feature similar cameras, because although the iPhone 8 has a much tinier back-facing camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, a lot less mega-pixels back-facing camera and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
The iPhone 8 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. HTC One M9 features a very superior battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has 2840mAh of battery capacity against 1821mAh.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC One M9. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the HTC One M9, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.