Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Asus |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-03-01 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.73 x 3.06 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Black Glare |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus SM8150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone II has an overall score of 88, which is much better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 general score. Asus ROG Phone II is a noticeably newer and just a bit thinner phone than HTC One M9, although it is incredibly heavier. HTC One M9 has just a bit better processing power than Asus ROG Phone II, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits CPU and an extra GPU.
The HTC One M9 counts with a little more vivid display than Asus ROG Phone II, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher amount of pixels in each inch of screen. Asus ROG Phone II features a better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video definition, the Asus ROG Phone II also has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels, better video frame rates, a larger aperture to take better photos in low-light environments and a larger sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Asus ROG Phone II features a much better memory for applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Asus ROG Phone II counts with a much better battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.