Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-03-01 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Aurora black |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is slightly better than HTC One M9's score of 77.7. The LG V50 ThinQ body is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner than HTC One M9's, although it's somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has a newer 10 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, counting with a couple additional features and optimized performance.
HTC One M9 counts with a bit faster CPU than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics co-processor and a 64 bits CPU. The HTC One M9 counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a way smaller screen, a little inferior number of pixels per display inch and a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ shoots clearer videos and photos than HTC One M9, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, a back facing camera with much less MP resolution and a smaller back camera sensor shooting lower quality pictures, it also counts with a much bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 41 percent bigger battery size.
The LG V50 ThinQ costs more than the HTC One M9, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.