Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Oppo |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-03-30 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a general score of 79.9, which is slightly better than the HTC One M9's score of 77.7. OPPO Find X3 Pro's body is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but heavier than HTC One M9. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but OPPO Find X3 Pro has newer 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, so it provides you lots of additional features.
HTC One M9 has a little sharper screen than OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a really smaller display. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The HTC One M9 has a little better hardware performance than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64-bits processor. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a much better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2840mAh.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a much better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera, higher video frame rates, a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and a much bigger sensor capturing way higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.