Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminium | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | TFT |
| 441 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is slightly better than the HTC One M9, having an 84.7 score against 77.7. The Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, and HTC One M9 works with Android 5.0 OS. The Galaxy A32 is a notably newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than HTC One M9, but it's also much heavier.
HTC One M9 has an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a much higher pixel density and a better 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 32 GB more internal storage.
The HTC One M9 features a bit better processor than Galaxy A32, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and an extra graphics processor. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Galaxy A32 has a little bit better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 also has a much higher resolution camera in the back and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.