Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-03-01 | 2019-06-20 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 is a little bit better than the HTC One M9, getting an 82.3 score against 77.7. Samsung Galaxy A60 is a newer and thinner phone than the HTC One M9, although it's also just a little heavier. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A60 has a more recent 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, providing lots of additional features and performance tweaks.
HTC One M9 has a brighter screen than Galaxy A60, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch. The HTC One M9 features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a graphics processing unit.
The Galaxy A60 features a very superior memory for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A60 has greater battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 20 percent larger battery size. HTC One M9 features a bit better camera than Galaxy A60, because although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the HTC One M9 also counts with a bigger sensor and a back-facing camera with more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.