Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is much better than the HTC One M9's score of 77.7. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0. The Galaxy A71 5G body is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than HTC One M9's, although it is also heavier.
HTC One M9 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density. Galaxy A71 5G features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
HTC One M9 has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64-bit CPU. Galaxy A71 5G features a lot better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a back facing camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution, a bigger aperture and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G costs a lot more money than the HTC One M9, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.