Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-03-01 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is just a bit better than HTC One M9, with an 84.9 score against 77.7. Although the Galaxy A80 is incredibly heavier than HTC One M9, it's a bit thinner and also way newer. The HTC One M9 has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A80, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64 bits processing unit.
The HTC One M9 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a really smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a bit better pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A80 has a slightly better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has a way better resolution back facing camera, a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and photos and a larger aperture for better images and video in low-light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A80 has improved battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 30% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.