Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android |
| 2015-03-01 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Black and White |
| Aluminium | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has an overall score of 90.5, which is much better than HTC One M9's 77.7 overall score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is extremely heavier than HTC One M9, it's thinner and newer. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android operating system, and HTC One M9 comes with Android 5.0 operating system.
The HTC One M9 has a sharper display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel number per screen inch. HTC One M9 features a little faster CPU than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has 3 GB less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and an extra graphics processing unit.
Galaxy A90 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality photos and a larger aperture.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better memory for applications and games than HTC One M9, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a way better battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.