Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-03-01 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Black and Gold |
| Aluminium | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is just a bit better than HTC One M9's global score of 77.7. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro construction is newer and much thinner than the HTC One M9's, but it's also somewhat heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, counting with some additional features.
The HTC One M9 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64-bits CPU. The HTC One M9 features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, the HTC One M9 also counts with a little greater quantity of pixels in each screen inch.
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than HTC One M9, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 256 GB. Galaxy C9 Pro features a much better battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
HTC One M9 captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with a better 20 mega-pixels resolution and a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.