Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Vivo |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than HTC One M9's global score of 77.7. These devices have Android operating system, but the vivo X60 Pro has a more recent 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, counting with some nice extra features and performance optimizations. Vivo X60 Pro's construction is way newer and thinner than the HTC One M9's, although it's somewhat heavier.
The HTC One M9 has a bit more powerful processing unit than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processor and an extra GPU. HTC One M9 counts with a more vivid display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a much better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also has a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and videos, a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera, faster video frame rate and a larger camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
Vivo X60 Pro has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X60 Pro has a very superior battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.