Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-11-13 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic; metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.46 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is much better than HTC One ME's overall score of 73.5. IPhone 12 Pro Max is a notably newer and incredibly thinner device than HTC One ME, although it's heavier. The iPhone 12 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 operating system.
HTC One ME counts with a little sharper display than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a bit greater pixels density. HTC One ME features much more storage for games and applications than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 2 TB.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a much better processing power than HTC One ME, because it has more RAM memory, a 64-bit processing unit and more cpu cores. The iPhone 12 Pro Max has better battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 30% more battery size. The iPhone 12 Pro Max takes better pictures and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower 12 megapixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture.
Although Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC One ME. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy HTC One ME, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.