Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.46 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than the HTC One ME's score of 73.5. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus design is noticeably newer and way thinner, but notably heavier than HTC One ME. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with an extremely better processing unit than HTC One ME, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone 8 Plus also has a 64-bit processing unit and a larger number of cores (and also faster).
HTC One ME counts with a more vivid display than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus shoots much better videos and photos than HTC One ME, because although it has a much tinier back camera sensor which provides a way lower image and video quality, a worse video resolution and a camera in the back with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
The iPhone 8 Plus has a slightly better storage for apps and games than HTC One ME, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. HTC One ME features a bit superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 6% more battery size.
Although iPhone 8 Plus is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as HTC One ME. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone 8 Plus, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the HTC One ME, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.