Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic; metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.46 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than the HTC One ME's general score of 73.5. The Apple iPhone X body is extremely newer and noticeably thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the HTC One ME. HTC One ME features a little more vivid display than iPhone X, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Apple iPhone X features a really superior performance than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone X also has a 64 bits processing unit and a higher number of faster cores. IPhone X features a bit more storage to install applications and games than HTC One ME, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
HTC One ME features a bit longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 2840mAh battery size instead of 2716mAh. The iPhone X counts with a better camera than HTC One ME, because although it has a worse (4K) video resolution, a lot smaller sensor capturing much lower quality videos and photographs and a way worse resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC One ME. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the HTC One ME, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.