Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.46 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is better than HTC One ME, having a score of 82 against 73.5. IPhone XR's body is incredibly newer and thinner than the HTC One ME's, but it is also a lot heavier. HTC One ME features a sharper display than iPhone XR, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a lot more pixels per inch of screen.
The HTC One ME features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XR, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 2 TB. The iPhone XR has a much better processing power than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone XR also has a larger number of cores and a 64-bit processor.
The iPhone XR captures much better photographs and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs, a worse (4K) video definition and a camera with much less MP, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low light situations.
Apple iPhone XR features a bit longer battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has a 2942mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC One ME. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Apple iPhone XR, else you can save some dollars and buy the HTC One ME, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.