Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic; metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.46 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is much better than the HTC One ME, getting a score of 84.2 against 73.5. Although Apple iPhone XS is heavier than the HTC One ME, it's notably thinner and extremely newer. The HTC One ME features a bit sharper display than iPhone XS, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a little bit better pixels amount per inch in the screen.
HTC One ME features much more memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone XS, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 2 TB. The iPhone XS counts with a very superior processor than HTC One ME, because it has a 64 bits processor, more RAM and a larger number of cores.
The HTC One ME counts with just a little bit longer battery life than iPhone XS, because it has 2840mAh of battery capacity. The iPhone XS takes much better photos and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photos, a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low-light images and video.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC One ME. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone XS, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the HTC One ME, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.