Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-06-03 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a general score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than HTC One ME's 73.5 score. Google Pixel 3a is a much newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and just a bit lighter than HTC One ME. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 3a has a more recent 11 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0, providing a couple nice extra features.
HTC One ME features a much better display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. HTC One ME has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 2 TB.
Google Pixel 3a features a bit more powerful processing unit than HTC One ME, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores (but slower). Google Pixel 3a has a better camera than HTC One ME, because although it has a lot worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution back camera, a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality pictures and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography.
Google Pixel 3a features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than HTC One ME, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.