Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-06-03 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL is a bit better than HTC One ME, having a 78.9 score against 73.5. The Google Pixel 3a XL design is newer and somewhat thinner than HTC One ME's, but it's just a bit heavier. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has a more recent 11 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, offering lots of additional features and enhanced performance.
The HTC One ME has a much better looking display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. HTC One ME counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 2 TB.
Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a little faster CPU than HTC One ME, because it has a higher number of cores and 1 GB more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 3a XL features better battery life than HTC One ME, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh. Google Pixel 3a XL has a superior camera than HTC One ME, because although it has a much worse resolution camera in the back, a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a smaller sensor capturing lower quality videos and photographs, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3a XL is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.