Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the HTC One ME, with a general score of 87.5 against 73.5. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0, offering a couple additional features and performance optimizations. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner, but also a little bit heavier than HTC One ME.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a more powerful processor than HTC One ME, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The HTC One ME counts with a much better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a worse video resolution, a tinier camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors and a camera in the back with a way lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low light situations.
HTC One ME has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a very superior battery life than HTC One ME, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lot more expensive than the HTC One ME, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.