Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2024-03-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Plastic; metal | Glass and Titanium |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 565 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.46 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is way better than HTC One ME, having a overall score of 92.1 against 73.5. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design design is notably newer and just a bit thinner than HTC One ME's, but it's heavier. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a newer 14 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a better looking screen than HTC One ME, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1280 x 2800 and a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a lot bigger screen. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much greater storage to install games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a faster processor than HTC One ME, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more processing cores. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much longer battery life than HTC One ME, because it has a 97 percent bigger battery size. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design captures greater pictures and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a way better 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, a lot bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and videos and a lot larger camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and pictures.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it is way more expensive than HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC One ME. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy HTC One ME, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.