Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Titan gray |
| Plastic; metal | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is better than HTC One ME's 73.5 general score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG K92 has a more recent 10 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0, counting with some nice extra features and increased performance. Although LG K92 is much heavier than the HTC One ME, it's thinner and noticeably newer.
HTC One ME has a much better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixels density. The LG K92 has just a bit better processing power than HTC One ME, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
LG K92 features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has an external SD slot that holds 48 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The LG K92 counts with a way better battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2840mAh.
The LG K92 has a much better camera than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the LG K92 also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures, a way higher resolution camera in the back and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
LG K92 costs a lot more than HTC One ME, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.