Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Mirror black |
| Plastic; metal | Glass and Metal |
| $ 249.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG Q70 has a score of 77.9, which is a little bit better than the HTC One ME's global score of 73.5. The LG Q70 body is newer and thinner, but way heavier than the HTC One ME. Both devices we are comparing here have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG Q70 has a more recent 10 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, providing you lots of additional features and improved performance.
The LG Q70 features a little faster processor than HTC One ME, because it has a greater amount of RAM and more cpu cores. The HTC One ME features a much better display than LG Q70, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a better pixels number in each display inch.
LG Q70 features a better memory for games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB against 2 TB, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. The LG Q70 has a much better battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG Q70 features a way better camera than HTC One ME, because although it has a tinier sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG Q70 also counts with a camera with way more MP and a larger camera aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments.
LG Q70 is a lot more expensive than HTC One ME, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.