Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Holographic white |
| Plastic; metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Stylo 6 has a general score of 76.7, which is slightly better than the HTC One ME's 73.5 general score. The LG Stylo 6 body is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than HTC One ME's, but it is much heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG Stylo 6 has the newer 10 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0, giving a lot of extra features and better performance.
LG Stylo 6 features a bit faster processor than HTC One ME, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM. HTC One ME counts with a brighter screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a slightly better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
LG Stylo 6 features more memory for apps and games than HTC One ME, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB against 2 TB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. The LG Stylo 6 features a slightly better camera than HTC One ME, because although it has a much smaller back camera sensor shooting much lower quality pictures and videos, a much worse video definition and a way worse 13 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better captures in poorly lited situations.
The LG Stylo 6 has a much better battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 41 percent more battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, LG Stylo 6 is also the cheapest, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.