Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-06-03 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a general score of 82.5, which is better than HTC One ME's 73.5 global score. Even though LG V30S ThinQ is a little heavier than HTC One ME, it's much thinner and a lot newer. These devices come with Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a quite superior processing power than HTC One ME, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. The HTC One ME features a brighter display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch of display.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a superior camera than HTC One ME, because although it has a worse video resolution, a lot tinier camera sensor which gives a much worse photo and video quality and a camera with lesser megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB against 2 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with better battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC One ME. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the HTC One ME, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.