Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black and Gray |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is better than the HTC One ME, having a general score of 81.3 against 73.5. LG V35 ThinQ is a incredibly newer and much thinner device than HTC One ME, but it is also just a little heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a quite better hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has more RAM memory and more cores.
The HTC One ME has a bit better looking display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher screen pixels density. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots much better videos and photos than HTC One ME, because although it has a camera with a lower resolution, a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a much smaller sensor shooting much worse quality photos, it also counts with a lot bigger diafragm aperture.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has an external SD slot that allows 48 GB smaller, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage capacity. LG V35 ThinQ features better battery life than HTC One ME, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more than HTC One ME, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.